History of Modern Philosophy Essay Example for Free

History of forward-looking Philosophy Essay1- How, and with what success, does Hume deal with the app bent anomaly of the absentminded stand in off of glooming sky?In A Treatise of Hu objet dart Nature, Hume attempt to rid 18th century moral philosophy of what he considered to be purposeless and vacuous concepts underlying our theory of knowledge be it metaphysical arguments or hypotheses seemingly formulated from the untarnished imagination of many philosophers. Influenced by the emerging trend of empiricism and naturalistic science like newton and Locke, which Hume owed much of his basic principles from Hume presented the Treatise as an attempt to introduce experimental methods of reasoning into the area of moral philosophy. In the head start book of the Treatise, entitled Of the Understanding, Hume devoted the first part Of the Origin of our Ideas for explaining the basis of his philosophical formation that appeals on the similar empiricist approach as that o f Lockes.However, curiously, Hume had cited an explicit rejoinder-argument the job of missing shade of blue that could void his whole philosophical system that is based on this central principle. Even more puzzling is Humes self-satisfaction with this problem, and although he considers the problem as singular and furtherional, he fully admitted to this counter example and did not search to resolve it. Yet, this case merits a deeper investigation, and it is this essays attempt to see whether his apparent complacency with the missing shade of blue would have any effect on the strength of his philosophical system, and other attempts to render this problem irrelevant.The problem of the missing shade of blue by Hume is as follows suppose a man who is well present with act upon for thirty years and has seen all(prenominal) the colours in the set of possible colour spectrum, and for cardinal particular shade of blue. Then, he is presented with a full spectrum of the shades of blue, from the darkest shade to the darkest, all except the hotshot particular shade in which he has not yet strikeed. It is because conceivable that this man would be able to produce this single missing shade of blue. The problem of this lies in the basis of the empiricist school of thought at which Hume is undermentioned, namely, that all cerebrations must be acquaintd by catch, yet, in this example, it is demonstrated that it is possible for an opinion to precede sensation grow, as the man is able to produce the idea of the missing shade of blue without having first encountered it through his senses.At this point, I would like to elaborate more on Humes theory of mind and the verge of credit of ideas as that would clarify wherefore this example is so damaging to Humes system. As stated in front, Humes project lot be put into a general label of empiricism, which is a belief that all knowledge comes from experience. much of his line of argument resembles that of Loc kes, another prominent empiricist. Hume even borrowed Lockes key terminology to a original extent, with price like ideas and impressions.Locke believes that ideas are whatever the mind perceives in itself, or is in the immediate object of perception, thought, or understanding, as when one perceives, thinks, or understands, the ideas are before the mind. This limits all ideas to be firstated from experience (perception), and similarly shows the corporation between thought and perception and their interchangeable nature. The ideas female genital organ be divided into ideas of sensation (touch, smell, sight, etc.) and ideas of reflection (fear, happiness, sadness, etc.), which notify then be separated further into easy and complex ideas, where complex ideas are derived from unbiased ones.Hume follows this line of argument with some modifications. He claims he restores the term ideas to its original sense by classifying the objects the mind is perceiving as perceptions, not dir ectly as ideas as Locke have used, and from perceptions he then distinguished them into impressions and ideas, where they differ in degree, as impressions are more vivid and forceful before the mind, such when sees a colour, and the ideas are more faint, such when one thinks of a colour after having the impressions of it.Hume then makes the distinction of truthful and complex ideas, and by introspection, Hume demonstrates that one can think of any simple ideas and then find match simple impressions that are exact copies of each other, and one can do this with any conceivable simple ideas. Complex ideas are antithetical in that they are composites of simple ideas.And with this experiment in introspection, Hume then postulates his first thesis, That all our simple ideas in their first appearance are derivd from simple impressions, which are correspondent to them, and which they exactly represent. We whitethorn blazon out this the Copy Principle, as it simply states that every sim ple idea is a copy of a corresponding impression.One of the most important components of this thesis is the fact that its a genetic one in that it shows the origin of ideas as following from impressions as impressions to be the cause of ideas. Again, this is proved by the constant conjunction of simple impressions preceding simple ideas, which one can do to every simple idea one may have. Another support Hume gives is that of a man born defective of certain perceptive organs, hence, missing certain impressions (e.g. sight or sound), one would not have any ideas of those corresponded with the impressions, for it is evident that deaf people also have great trouble speaking. The genetic component is important in that they validate the empiricism tenet on the reliance of experience.Anyhow, now we can see how the problem seems to defeat the purpose of this thesis. Moreover, a counter example, from a logical standpoint, one counter example is sufficient to turn an argument invalid. So w hy did Hume not deal with this problem?We may try to take it as Hume claimed the problem to be a singular case where it is not worth investing time on. Being a singular case, one may have to take the argument in closer inspection. Hume states explicitly that the man in challenge may have enjoyed the sights for thirty years and perfectly well acquainted with all the possible colours except one, and that may be the attempt by him to restrict this to some specific scenario.It is implicitly engraft in the counter example that the rout of this example must be well acquainted with all the colours, such that one can make up colours in ones mind, much like how unaccompanied musicians of a certain skill level can sight read music. Thus, it appeals to some amount of experience such that one may be bound to experience, habits, or personal background. Yet, when given further consideration, this seems to be invalid as well, as these restrictions do not seem to hold. As far as experience go, a child who does not know what turquoise mean does not necessarily have an idea of the colour turquoise.So this case is certainly not an exceptional case and Hume had not dealt with it satisfactorily. Yet, Humean scholars have tested to find solutions for this problem and some even disregard it as a problem altogether.Firstly, the first dissent to this counter argument is that there is no way to test whether the person in question does in fact have an idea of the missing shade of blue before seeing the missing shade or not. There is a great difference between being able to spot a missing spot in a complete spectrum of blue, and being able to produce an idea of the shade of blue without first encountering the impression of it.If ones sees a constant change in shade from, lets say blue-0 where it is darkest to blue-255 where it is the lightest shade, then if there is one shade of blue missing, it would be quite noticeable as the mind notices the come up in gradual and constant chan ge, but it does not follow that one could create an idea of that missing shade. To test this is also impossible, as if one is to reproduce colour, it still does not follow that he produces the idea since he would only be mixing the existing colours to brighter shades, and thus, after finishing mixing the colour, one then has the idea of the colour following the impression. All other ways of testing is equally empty because they all involve exposing the subject to the missing impression one way or another.Alternatively, if we look at the thesis again, and instead of taking it as a genetic form of the argument that Hume meant it to be, and instead, modifies it slightly to a more analytical empiricism form. Humes thesis on the theory of mind, upon closer inspection, can be taken as a form of meaning empiricism, in the sense that ideas to him are the same as different thoughts, which are different kinds of concepts, which is linked to when one understands something in a linguistic sen se one is linking the intelligence operation with the meaning, or the concepts associated to the word.Hence, if we think of the initial genetic content of the thesis, that impressions strictly precedes ideas, we may relax it slightly in favour of the analogy to meaning empiricism and forget its genetic form and instead formulate the following thesis that all simple ideas must have corresponding conceivable and encounterable impressions. By doing this, we are no longer faced with the problem of the missing shade, since it is perfectly possible that the subject would be able to encounter this particular shade.Lastly, from a personal view, I see the problem of the missing shade of blue as not a problem at all, but Humes mistake lies in classifying colours as simple ideas. It is true that the impressions of light blue might very well be different than dark blue, so to speak, but to use Humes method, it is possible to separate using our imagination the components light and dark from bl ue. Thus, it is the impression of amobarbital sodium which is a simple impression, combined with the impression of light and absent of light that combine to give this gang of shades of colours. Take this example, suppose some neutral shade of blue, lets number it blue 124, were put someplace with light, you will be able to see blue 124.However, lets say for some reason, the inhabit becomes lighter, certainly, the shade of blue 124 would have changed to some lighter shade of perhaps blue 200. If we vary the light in the room from darkest to lightest, it is then possible to observe from the darkest to the lightest shade of blue likewise. One may argue that the colour can be calibrated to some objective criteria, perhaps the ratio of pigments of colour blue of some sort, yet, that does not matter since all that matters to Hume is indeed only impression. Furthermore, using this example, we can also say that perhaps the subject of the experiment may have in fact encountered the parti cular shade of blue sometime before without acknowledging it.Conclusively, although Humes treatment of the missing shade of blue is very limited and very complacent, it is perhaps Humes own mistake for considering such example a problem, rather than the problem itself being a threat to his theory of origins of ideas.